Forge Intelligence

Validation, Verification, and Assurance Intelligence

Establish warranted confidence in a claim, model, plan, decision, artifact, process, or system by defining criteria, tracing evidence, applying independent checks, exposing discrepancies, and issuing a bounded validation…

Updated

Definition

Establish warranted confidence in a claim, model, plan, decision, artifact, process, or system by defining criteria, tracing evidence, applying independent checks, exposing discrepancies, and issuing a bounded validation status.

Coverage role

Provides the independent assurance layer for every other intelligence. Verification asks whether declared requirements were met; validation asks whether the result is fit for its intended use and stakeholder need.

Scope

Included

  • validation object and intended use
  • acceptance and assurance criteria
  • claim and requirement traceability
  • inspection analysis demonstration and testing
  • formal and property-based checks
  • evidence triangulation
  • adversarial and boundary testing
  • reproducibility and independence
  • discrepancy adjudication
  • residual risk and release status

Excluded and non-goals

  • self-certification by the generating model
  • using a checklist as proof without evidence
  • claiming legal regulatory or professional certification without authority
  • hiding failed tests
  • validating outside the declared version scope population or operating conditions
  • confusing plausibility fluency confidence or popularity with correctness

Boundary rules

  • Route to general.validation-verification when the requested outcome requires one or more declared capabilities and the output can be represented by its canonical artifacts.
  • Route to an adjacent or specialist intelligence when domain-specific rules, tools, or professional authority dominate the problem.
  • Use general.reasoning to coordinate multi-pack conflicts, hard constraints, uncertainty, and decision status.
  • Return ask, defer, or escalate when required context, source authority, consent, or accountable ownership is missing.

Capability semantics

Capability ID Name Semantic intent
capability.general.validation-verification.define_validation_object_and_stakes Define Validation Object And Stakes Identify exactly what version claim artifact model process or system is being checked, for whom, for what use, and at what consequence level.
capability.general.validation-verification.derive_assurance_criteria Derive Assurance Criteria Convert needs requirements invariants policies hazards and claims into observable pass fail or inconclusive criteria.
capability.general.validation-verification.build_traceability_matrix Build Traceability Matrix Link each material claim or requirement to evidence, method, validator, owner, result, and unresolved gap.
capability.general.validation-verification.select_verification_methods Select Verification Methods Choose inspection analysis demonstration testing formal proof simulation peer review or independent reproduction according to claim type and risk.
capability.general.validation-verification.validate_intended_use_and_stakeholder_fit Validate Intended Use And Stakeholder Fit Check that the result addresses the real need, population, context, usability, accessibility, and unacceptable outcomes.
capability.general.validation-verification.run_boundary_adversarial_and_robustness_tests Run Boundary Adversarial And Robustness Tests Test edge cases counterexamples perturbations misuse scenarios distribution shifts and failure conditions.
capability.general.validation-verification.triangulate_and_reproduce_evidence Triangulate And Reproduce Evidence Compare independent sources methods tools reviewers or runs and distinguish reproduction from replication.
capability.general.validation-verification.adjudicate_discrepancies Adjudicate Discrepancies Classify failures as defect evidence gap criterion problem environment issue or accepted deviation with owner and expiry.
capability.general.validation-verification.issue_bounded_validation_status Issue Bounded Validation Status Report pass fail conditional inconclusive or not-tested status, validation domain, residual risk, release decision, and reopen triggers.

Canonical artifact concepts

Artifact type Structural category Semantic purpose
artifact.general.validation-verification.validation_charter brief Validation Charter for Validation, Verification, and Assurance Intelligence: A bounded specification of purpose, stakeholders, requirements, constraints, assumptions, and success criteria. It supports the pack purpose of establish warranted confidence in a claim, model, plan, decision, artifact, process, or system by defining criteria, tracing evidence, applying independent checks, exposing discrepancies, and issuing a bounded validation status.
artifact.general.validation-verification.assurance_and_acceptance_criteria acceptance_contract Assurance And Acceptance Criteria for Validation, Verification, and Assurance Intelligence: A traceable requirement and acceptance contract linking each obligation to an observable criterion, verifier, owner, and status. It supports the pack purpose of establish warranted confidence in a claim, model, plan, decision, artifact, process, or system by defining criteria, tracing evidence, applying independent checks, exposing discrepancies, and issuing a bounded validation status.
artifact.general.validation-verification.claim_requirement_traceability_matrix model Claim Requirement Traceability Matrix for Validation, Verification, and Assurance Intelligence: A purpose-bounded representation of entities, relationships, assumptions, boundaries, and evidence of adequacy. It supports the pack purpose of establish warranted confidence in a claim, model, plan, decision, artifact, process, or system by defining criteria, tracing evidence, applying independent checks, exposing discrepancies, and issuing a bounded validation status.
artifact.general.validation-verification.verification_and_validation_plan plan Verification And Validation Plan for Validation, Verification, and Assurance Intelligence: A governed action design that sequences work, ownership, dependencies, timing, contingencies, and review. It supports the pack purpose of establish warranted confidence in a claim, model, plan, decision, artifact, process, or system by defining criteria, tracing evidence, applying independent checks, exposing discrepancies, and issuing a bounded validation status.
artifact.general.validation-verification.test_and_inspection_suite structured_output Test And Inspection Suite for Validation, Verification, and Assurance Intelligence: A typed domain output that preserves purpose, context, evidence, assumptions, status, and next action. It supports the pack purpose of establish warranted confidence in a claim, model, plan, decision, artifact, process, or system by defining criteria, tracing evidence, applying independent checks, exposing discrepancies, and issuing a bounded validation status.
artifact.general.validation-verification.evidence_triangulation_matrix model Evidence Triangulation Matrix for Validation, Verification, and Assurance Intelligence: A purpose-bounded representation of entities, relationships, assumptions, boundaries, and evidence of adequacy. It supports the pack purpose of establish warranted confidence in a claim, model, plan, decision, artifact, process, or system by defining criteria, tracing evidence, applying independent checks, exposing discrepancies, and issuing a bounded validation status.
artifact.general.validation-verification.adversarial_and_robustness_report analysis Adversarial And Robustness Report for Validation, Verification, and Assurance Intelligence: An evidence-linked assessment that states criteria, findings, uncertainty, limitations, status, and action. It supports the pack purpose of establish warranted confidence in a claim, model, plan, decision, artifact, process, or system by defining criteria, tracing evidence, applying independent checks, exposing discrepancies, and issuing a bounded validation status.
artifact.general.validation-verification.discrepancy_and_deviation_log ledger Discrepancy And Deviation Log for Validation, Verification, and Assurance Intelligence: A controlled collection of uniquely identified entries with ownership, provenance, status, and review state. It supports the pack purpose of establish warranted confidence in a claim, model, plan, decision, artifact, process, or system by defining criteria, tracing evidence, applying independent checks, exposing discrepancies, and issuing a bounded validation status.
artifact.general.validation-verification.validation_report analysis Validation Report for Validation, Verification, and Assurance Intelligence: An evidence-linked assessment that states criteria, findings, uncertainty, limitations, status, and action. It supports the pack purpose of establish warranted confidence in a claim, model, plan, decision, artifact, process, or system by defining criteria, tracing evidence, applying independent checks, exposing discrepancies, and issuing a bounded validation status.
artifact.general.validation-verification.residual_risk_and_release_decision decision Residual Risk And Release Decision for Validation, Verification, and Assurance Intelligence: A bounded decision or routing record that exposes alternatives, governing constraints, evidence, rationale, ownership, status, and reopening conditions. It supports the pack purpose of establish warranted confidence in a claim, model, plan, decision, artifact, process, or system by defining criteria, tracing evidence, applying independent checks, exposing discrepancies, and issuing a bounded validation status.
artifact.general.validation-verification.intended_use_and_stakeholder_fit_assessment analysis Intended Use And Stakeholder Fit Assessment for Validation, Verification, and Assurance Intelligence: An evidence-linked assessment that states criteria, findings, uncertainty, limitations, status, and action. It supports the pack purpose of establish warranted confidence in a claim, model, plan, decision, artifact, process, or system by defining criteria, tracing evidence, applying independent checks, exposing discrepancies, and issuing a bounded validation status.

Method families and limits

Method ID Method Use when Avoid when
method.general.validation-verification.requirements_verification_and_intended_use_validation requirements verification and intended-use validation Use when a claim, requirement, artifact, process, model, or system needs bounded evidence of conformance and fitness for intended use. Avoid self-certification by the generator alone, tests without traceability to claims, or a pass status that omits untested scope and residual risk.
method.general.validation-verification.inspection_analysis_demonstration_and_test inspection analysis demonstration and test Use when a claim, requirement, artifact, process, model, or system needs bounded evidence of conformance and fitness for intended use. Avoid self-certification by the generator alone, tests without traceability to claims, or a pass status that omits untested scope and residual risk.
method.general.validation-verification.formal_proof_and_constraint_solving formal proof and constraint solving Use when variables, domains, rules, invariants, or proof obligations can be represented formally and a witness, counterexample, or unsatisfied core is decision-relevant. Avoid encoding ambiguous natural-language rules as hard constraints without review or treating solver satisfiability as evidence that the real-world model is complete.
method.general.validation-verification.property_based_and_metamorphic_testing property-based and metamorphic testing Use when correctness can be probed through invariants, generated cases, transformations, reference outputs, or independent implementations. Avoid relying on a narrow golden set, nondeterministic oracles without tolerance, or generated cases that violate the real input domain.
method.general.validation-verification.golden_set_and_differential_testing golden-set and differential testing Use when correctness can be probed through invariants, generated cases, transformations, reference outputs, or independent implementations. Avoid relying on a narrow golden set, nondeterministic oracles without tolerance, or generated cases that violate the real input domain.
method.general.validation-verification.peer_review_and_independent_verification_and_validation peer review and independent verification and validation Use when a claim, requirement, artifact, process, model, or system needs bounded evidence of conformance and fitness for intended use. Avoid self-certification by the generator alone, tests without traceability to claims, or a pass status that omits untested scope and residual risk.
method.general.validation-verification.source_triangulation source triangulation Use when the reliability of a conclusion depends on locating original evidence, comparing independent sources, preserving scope, and identifying conflicts. Avoid equating repetition with independence, citing summaries for claims available in primary sources, or merging conflicting evidence into a single unsupported score.
method.general.validation-verification.reproduction_replication_and_calibration reproduction replication and calibration Use when confidence depends on repeating a result, independently reimplementing it, comparing it with reference data, or estimating systematic measurement error. Avoid calling a same-code rerun an independent replication, hiding deviations from the original conditions, or treating agreement within one dataset as general validity.
method.general.validation-verification.red_team_boundary_and_misuse_testing red-team boundary and misuse testing Use when a claim, requirement, artifact, process, model, or system needs bounded evidence of conformance and fitness for intended use. Avoid self-certification by the generator alone, tests without traceability to claims, or a pass status that omits untested scope and residual risk.

Pack-specific invariants

The pack also inherits the core invariants in core/core_invariants.yaml.

Invariant ID Statement Failure action
invariant.general.validation-verification.01_verification_and_validation_are_distinguished_and_both_ref Verification and validation are distinguished and both reference an explicit object version and intended use. repair_or_conditional_pass
invariant.general.validation-verification.02_criteria_are_defined_before_final_evaluation_or_any_post_h Criteria are defined before final evaluation or any post-hoc criteria are labeled and justified. repair_or_conditional_pass
invariant.general.validation-verification.03_every_material_pass_claim_has_traceable_evidence_from_a_me Every material pass claim has traceable evidence from a method appropriate to the claim type. repair_or_conditional_pass
invariant.general.validation-verification.04_generator_self_confidence_is_never_sufficient_validation_e Generator self-confidence is never sufficient validation evidence. repair_or_conditional_pass
invariant.general.validation-verification.05_failed_skipped_flaky_inconclusive_and_out_of_scope_checks Failed skipped flaky inconclusive and out-of-scope checks remain visible. repair_or_conditional_pass
invariant.general.validation-verification.06_validator_independence_and_strength_are_proportional_to_co Validator independence and strength are proportional to consequence and conflict of interest. repair_or_conditional_pass
invariant.general.validation-verification.07_the_status_is_bounded_to_declared_conditions_population_da The status is bounded to declared conditions population data version and time window. repair_or_conditional_pass
invariant.general.validation-verification.08_residual_uncertainty_risk_accepted_deviations_and_reopenin Residual uncertainty risk accepted deviations and reopening triggers accompany release. repair_or_conditional_pass
invariant.general.validation-verification.09_certification_accreditation_and_professional_sign_off_are Certification accreditation and professional sign-off are claimed only when the responsible authority provides them. repair_or_conditional_pass

Dependencies and relations

Operational general intelligences: general.question-framing
Foundation concepts: general.logical-constraint, general.epistemic-evidence, general.metacognitive, general.diagnostic, general.strategic-adversarial, general.tool-computational, general.ethical-normative
Life intelligences: None

Source roles

Source ID Claim roles Runtime resolution required
nasa.systems_engineering concept_definition, engineering_method, verification_and_validation False
nasa.systems_modeling concept_definition, engineering_method, verification_and_validation False
nap.reproducibility_replicability concept_definition, research_and_evidence_practice False
nist.engineering_statistics concept_definition, measurement_or_security_practice, risk_control False

Risk and authority boundary

Risk class: moderate

  • The result would be represented as regulatory professional clinical legal financial safety or security certification.
  • Independent evidence is unavailable for a high-consequence claim yet release is requested.
  • Validation reveals a credible immediate hazard rights violation security exposure or material deception.

Accountable people retain consent, value, regulated, irreversible, and residual-risk decisions. This semantic page does not claim a deployed implementation.

Maturity

semantic: S3_reviewable_definition
contract: C3_testable_contract
implementation: I0_not_included
evidence: E2_source_roles_mapped
governance: G2_controls_and_review_defined
overlay: O2_paired_seed_complete

Paired overlay

Runtime maturity

  • Capabilities: 9
  • Technical floor→ceiling: I1_runtimeI2_integrated
  • Autonomy floor→ceiling: A0_assistedA0_assisted
  • I1_runtime count: 8
  • Evidence class: contract: 8, semantic: 1
  • Full hierarchy: MATURITY-HIERARCHY.md

Evaluation suite status

  • CI status: pass
  • Suite: evaluation_suites/validation-verification.yaml
  • Cases defined: 7
  • Capabilities under test: 9