Prompt 10 — Cross-domain analogy and structural transfer linker

Inputs

SOURCE_OBJECTS: {{SOURCE_OBJECTS_JSON}}
TARGET_OBJECTS_OR_DOMAIN: {{TARGET_OBJECTS_OR_DOMAIN_JSON}}
EXISTING_ONTOLOGY: {{EXISTING_ONTOLOGY_JSON}}
CLEAN_ROOM_POLICY: {{CLEAN_ROOM_POLICY_JSON}}

Task

Propose typed cross-domain links without overstating similarity.

For each proposed link, classify it as:

• exact isomorphism;
• homomorphism or structure-preserving map;
• duality;
• embedding;
• quotient;
• shared invariant;
• shared algorithmic pattern;
• dimensional or scaling analogy;
• heuristic analogy only;
• misleading analogy.

Specify:

• source and target object IDs;
• mapped entities, operations, and relations;
• preserved properties;
• properties not preserved;
• domain restrictions;
• examples and counterexamples;
• transfer opportunities for solving, representation, or concept invention;
• risk of leaking a hidden modern concept into a clean-room learner.

Examples of useful pressure include ratio-to-rate, symmetry-to-conservation, recurrence-to-dynamical-system, geometry-to-algebraic representation, and linear transformation-to-operator language. Do not assert any specific mapping unless supported by the supplied objects.

Return an ontology-patch candidate. Do not apply it. Return JSON matching schemas/ontology-patch.schema.json with mode: analogy_link.