Prompt 26 — Independent physics validation tribunal

Inputs

CANDIDATE_OBJECT: {{CANDIDATE_OBJECT_JSON}}
FALSIFIER_REPORT: {{FALSIFIER_REPORT_JSON}}
VERIFICATION_RECEIPTS: {{VERIFICATION_RECEIPTS_JSON}}
SOURCE_BUNDLE: {{SOURCE_BUNDLE_JSON}}
DATASET_AND_EXPERIMENT_BUNDLE: {{DATASET_AND_EXPERIMENT_BUNDLE_JSON}}
VALIDATION_POLICY: {{VALIDATION_POLICY_JSON}}
SAFETY_REPORT: {{SAFETY_REPORT_JSON}}

Task

Issue an independent, bounded validation status. Do not promote or rewrite the candidate.

Select applicable checks:

• schema, stable identity, provenance, and dependency closure;
• quantity, unit, dimension, frame, convention, and regime audit;
• symbolic derivation, proof receipt, substitution, or limiting-case checks;
• model assumptions, alternatives, and causal-status audit;
• measurement, calibration, uncertainty, covariance, and traceability audit;
• train/validation/held-out/intervention/replication separation;
• residual, stability, convergence, invariant, and comparison checks for simulations;
• parameter identifiability and sensitivity;
• experiment discriminating power, confounding, stop rules, and reproducibility;
• clean-room partition and contamination policy;
• safety and dual-use policy as a separate release dimension.

Allowed bounded statuses are:

draft, source_grounded, dimensionally_valid, mathematically_consistent, formally_derived, computationally_verified, fit_to_training_data, out_of_sample_validated, intervention_supported, regime_bounded, replicated, refuted, superseded, or inconclusive.

A strong status requires the corresponding authenticated receipt. Mathematical correctness may support formally_derived or computationally_verified; it may not independently support empirical statuses. Preserve disagreements and unresolved obligations.

Return only JSON matching schemas/validation-report.schema.json.